{"id":254,"date":"2015-12-10T09:20:51","date_gmt":"2015-12-10T15:20:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.masstortlawyerblog.com\/?p=254"},"modified":"2018-04-23T11:36:06","modified_gmt":"2018-04-23T16:36:06","slug":"mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/","title":{"rendered":"Mississippi Court Dismisses Medical Device Action Against Foreign Manufacturer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/district-courts\/mississippi\/mssdce\/1:2014cv00271\/86545\/41\/\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Arnoult v. CL Med. Sarl<\/em><\/a>, a product liability case, the plaintiff filed suit against the manufacturer of a mid-urethral sling intended to treat stress urinary incontinence. The device, called an I-STOP, was manufactured by a company based in France called CLMS, which sold\u00a0the device in the United States. The device was distributed by another company called Uroplasty, which the plaintiff also sued in her product liability action.<\/p>\n<p>In her complaint, the plaintiff alleged claims of\u00a0design and warning defects pursuant to Mississippi&#8217;s Products Liability Act, in addition to actions based on\u00a0negligence, breach of express and implied warranties, fraud by concealment, fraud, negligent infliction of emotional distress, negligent misrepresentation, and loss of consortium.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/#more-254\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Arnoult v. CL Med. Sarl, a product liability case, the plaintiff filed suit against the manufacturer of a mid-urethral sling intended to treat stress urinary incontinence. The device, called an I-STOP, was manufactured by a company based in France called CLMS, which sold\u00a0the device in the United States. The device was distributed by another [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-medical-devices"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mississippi Court Dismisses Medical Device Action Against Foreign Manufacturer &#8212; Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog &#8212; December 10, 2015<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In Arnoult v. CL Med. Sarl, a product liability case, the plaintiff filed suit against the manufacturer of a mid-urethral sling intended to treat stress &#8212; December 10, 2015\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Mississippi Court Dismisses Medical Device Action Against Foreign Manufacturer &#8212; Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog &#8212; December 10, 2015\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"In Arnoult v. CL Med. Sarl, a product liability case, the plaintiff filed suit against the manufacturer of a mid-urethral sling intended to treat stress &#8212; December 10, 2015\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Moll Law Group\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mississippi Court Dismisses Medical Device Action Against Foreign Manufacturer &#8212; Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog &#8212; December 10, 2015","description":"In Arnoult v. CL Med. Sarl, a product liability case, the plaintiff filed suit against the manufacturer of a mid-urethral sling intended to treat stress &#8212; December 10, 2015","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Mississippi Court Dismisses Medical Device Action Against Foreign Manufacturer &#8212; Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog &#8212; December 10, 2015","twitter_description":"In Arnoult v. CL Med. Sarl, a product liability case, the plaintiff filed suit against the manufacturer of a mid-urethral sling intended to treat stress &#8212; December 10, 2015","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Moll Law Group","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/"},"author":{"name":"Moll Law Group","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/53d2eb37d5d0cdb46ac61abacf05ce90"},"headline":"Mississippi Court Dismisses Medical Device Action Against Foreign Manufacturer","datePublished":"2015-12-10T15:20:51+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-23T16:36:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/"},"wordCount":675,"articleSection":["Medical Devices"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/","url":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/","name":"Mississippi Court Dismisses Medical Device Action Against Foreign Manufacturer &#8212; Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog &#8212; December 10, 2015","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-12-10T15:20:51+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-23T16:36:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/53d2eb37d5d0cdb46ac61abacf05ce90"},"description":"In Arnoult v. CL Med. Sarl, a product liability case, the plaintiff filed suit against the manufacturer of a mid-urethral sling intended to treat stress &#8212; December 10, 2015","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/mississippi-court-dismisses-medical-device-action-against-foreign-manufacturer\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mississippi Court Dismisses Medical Device Action Against Foreign Manufacturer"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/","name":"Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog","description":"Published by Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Attorney \u2014 Moll Law Group","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/53d2eb37d5d0cdb46ac61abacf05ce90","name":"Moll Law Group","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0febdc96ea554e620e775358f9d7e4fc56616188dfd2bb21b18c2fed4bd185a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0febdc96ea554e620e775358f9d7e4fc56616188dfd2bb21b18c2fed4bd185a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0febdc96ea554e620e775358f9d7e4fc56616188dfd2bb21b18c2fed4bd185a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Moll Law Group"}}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=254"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2179,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254\/revisions\/2179"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}