{"id":838,"date":"2016-05-28T07:31:02","date_gmt":"2016-05-28T12:31:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.masstortlawyerblog.com\/?p=838"},"modified":"2018-04-12T12:40:03","modified_gmt":"2018-04-12T17:40:03","slug":"u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Supreme Court Issues Key Opinion for Class Action Lawsuits"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The United States Supreme Court recently handed down an opinion that may have broad implications for class action lawsuits. In\u00a0<em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/15pdf\/13-1339_f2q3.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins<\/a><\/em>, the defendant maintained a search engine that allowed users to search specifically for people through its database. Employers could use the site to gain information about job applicants before deciding whether to hire them. The plaintiff discovered that the profile Spokeo provided for him contained numerous mistakes and other improper information. He brought a federal class action lawsuit against Spokeo, stating that it did not comply with the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act.<\/p>\n<p>The lower court dismissed the lawsuit, stating that he had not adequately pleaded that he had suffered an actual injury as a result of the incorrect information in his profile. According to federal pleading standards, a plaintiff must establish that he or she has suffered a cognizable injury before being deemed entitled to compensation. This is known as the injury in fact requirement.<\/p>\n<p>On appeal to the Ninth Circuit, the court reversed, finding that the plaintiff and other class members had an interest in how Spokeo handled their credit information. This was sufficient to establish an injury in fact, the court concluded.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/#more-838\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The United States Supreme Court recently handed down an opinion that may have broad implications for class action lawsuits. In\u00a0Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, the defendant maintained a search engine that allowed users to search specifically for people through its database. Employers could use the site to gain information about job applicants before deciding whether to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-838","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-class-actions"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>U.S. Supreme Court Issues Key Opinion for Class Action Lawsuits &#8212; Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog &#8212; May 28, 2016<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The United States Supreme Court recently handed down an opinion that may have broad implications for class action lawsuits. In\u00a0Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, the &#8212; May 28, 2016\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"U.S. Supreme Court Issues Key Opinion for Class Action Lawsuits &#8212; Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog &#8212; May 28, 2016\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The United States Supreme Court recently handed down an opinion that may have broad implications for class action lawsuits. In\u00a0Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, the &#8212; May 28, 2016\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Moll Law Group\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"U.S. Supreme Court Issues Key Opinion for Class Action Lawsuits &#8212; Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog &#8212; May 28, 2016","description":"The United States Supreme Court recently handed down an opinion that may have broad implications for class action lawsuits. In\u00a0Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, the &#8212; May 28, 2016","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"U.S. Supreme Court Issues Key Opinion for Class Action Lawsuits &#8212; Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog &#8212; May 28, 2016","twitter_description":"The United States Supreme Court recently handed down an opinion that may have broad implications for class action lawsuits. In\u00a0Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, the &#8212; May 28, 2016","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Moll Law Group","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/"},"author":{"name":"Moll Law Group","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/53d2eb37d5d0cdb46ac61abacf05ce90"},"headline":"U.S. Supreme Court Issues Key Opinion for Class Action Lawsuits","datePublished":"2016-05-28T12:31:02+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-12T17:40:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/"},"wordCount":529,"articleSection":["Class Actions"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/","url":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/","name":"U.S. Supreme Court Issues Key Opinion for Class Action Lawsuits &#8212; Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog &#8212; May 28, 2016","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-05-28T12:31:02+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-12T17:40:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/53d2eb37d5d0cdb46ac61abacf05ce90"},"description":"The United States Supreme Court recently handed down an opinion that may have broad implications for class action lawsuits. In\u00a0Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, the &#8212; May 28, 2016","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/u-s-supreme-court-issues-key-opinion-class-action-lawsuits\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"U.S. Supreme Court Issues Key Opinion for Class Action Lawsuits"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/","name":"Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog","description":"Published by Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Attorney \u2014 Moll Law Group","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/53d2eb37d5d0cdb46ac61abacf05ce90","name":"Moll Law Group","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0febdc96ea554e620e775358f9d7e4fc56616188dfd2bb21b18c2fed4bd185a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0febdc96ea554e620e775358f9d7e4fc56616188dfd2bb21b18c2fed4bd185a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0febdc96ea554e620e775358f9d7e4fc56616188dfd2bb21b18c2fed4bd185a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Moll Law Group"}}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/838","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=838"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/838\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1634,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/838\/revisions\/1634"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=838"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=838"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.molllawgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=838"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}