We are happy to announce that we're celebrating 30 years! →

Transcript - Nap Nanny - A Danger to Infants

Nap Nanny infant recliners have been linked to at least 6 infant deaths since the products’ introduction in 2009. Nap Nanny is a portable infant recliner designed for sleeping, resting and playing. The recliner includes a bucket seat shaped foam base and a fitted fabric cover with a three-point harness to hold the baby securely in place.

Though a popular sleep aid with parents, the Consumer Product Safety Commission received at least 92 incident reports involving the Nap Nanny Generation Two Recliners and Nap Nanny Chill products. These reports included startling claims of infants hanging or falling over the side of the products. The Commission alleged that the Nap Nanny contains a design defect, that its use presents a risk of injury to infants, and that the instructions and warnings are inadequate.

Nap Nanny was first recalled in 2010 after regulators found that its harness could trap babies in an unsafe position causing them to suffocate. By 2013, it was illegal to sell the Nap Nanny in the United States. Safety experts worry that these products can still be found at yard sales, online auction sites, or given as hand-me-down gifts. The Consumer Product Safety Commission has one message for parents about the Nap Nanny: Stop using it! It’s an entrapment and suffocation risk to babies. Consumers are urged to dispose of the products to ensure they are never used again.

Our goal at Moll Law Group is to inform consumers of potentially dangerous products and provide assistance with the filing of claims. If you have a case and would like a prompt and confidential evaluation, please fill out our free consultation form. For free consumer safety information and case updates, visit us at ‪legalnewsnetwork.com.

Client Reviews

★★★★★
"He’s not afraid to take on the big companies. He has sued Ford, he has sued Merck, Bridgestone, Firestone… He’s fearless. He’s relentless." Deane Brown
★★★★★
"He was able to richly bless us with some medical reimbursements for losing Hope that we didn’t expect. It didn’t replace Hope, it never will replace. But it just gave us a lot of blessing." Melanie Moul
★★★★★
"He was there not to do something for himself, he was there to help me with my problem. And that’s what he did, he took care of it." Anne Levy
★★★★★
"Ken is unique among attorneys that I've worked with because as he pursues cases, he's always focused on the individuals, strategizing ways to best serve the needs of the client. He's a lawyer for people." John Galarnyk
★★★★★
"He’s very kind, and he’s just someone that you can really count on. Always." Michael McStraw