Transcript - Pradaxa - May Lead to Serious Bleeding Events and Death

40% of all deaths and serious bleeding events related to the popular blood-thinning medication Pradaxa could have been avoided by simple blood testing. Pradaxa is a best selling prescription medication intended to reduce the risks of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, or a-fib, a heart rhythm disorder.

Prior to approving the drug, researchers found that monitoring the blood levels of patients periodically could allow doctors to lower the dose of the drug or stop it temporarily in patients who have dangerously high levels of Pradaxa in their blood. The ability to prescribe Pradaxa without requiring regular blood tests is one of the chief selling points of the drug, which generated $837 million in U.S. sales in 2013.

This is not the first time Pradaxa has been in the spotlight. In 2011, just one year after the drug was introduced to the market, Pradaxa was one of the most frequently mentioned drugs in the FDA’s database of adverse events. Fatalities from using the drug climbed to over 500.

In May 2014, Boehringer Ingelheim, the makers of Pradaxa, settled more than 4,000 lawsuits for $650 million. Claims spanned from 2010 to beyond 2013 after users experienced side effects such as hemorrhaging. Even after the settlements, Boehringer Ingelheim stands by Pradaxa and maintains the drug is safe. Researchers would like to eliminate the recommendation that patients do not need routine anticoagulant monitoring. They also contend that the FDA should approve a lower dose than is currently available, which could reduce serious bleeding without loss of efficacy in preventing strokes.

Our goal at Moll Law Group is to inform consumers of potentially dangerous products and provide assistance with the filing of claims. If you have a case and would like a prompt and confidential evaluation, please fill out our free consultation form. For free consumer safety information and case updates, visit us at ‪legalnewsnetwork.com.

Client Reviews

★★★★★
"He’s not afraid to take on the big companies. He has sued Ford, he has sued Merck, Bridgestone, Firestone… He’s fearless. He’s relentless." Deane Brown
★★★★★
"He was able to richly bless us with some medical reimbursements for losing Hope that we didn’t expect. It didn’t replace Hope, it never will replace. But it just gave us a lot of blessing." Melanie Moul
★★★★★
"He was there not to do something for himself, he was there to help me with my problem. And that’s what he did, he took care of it." Anne Levy
★★★★★
"Ken is unique among attorneys that I've worked with because as he pursues cases, he's always focused on the individuals, strategizing ways to best serve the needs of the client. He's a lawyer for people." John Galarnyk
★★★★★
"He’s very kind, and he’s just someone that you can really count on. Always." Michael McStraw