We are happy to announce that we're celebrating 30 years! →

Wyeth's Prempro Problems Galvanize Plaintiffs' Lawyers - The Wall Street Journal - July 16, 2002

By: Milo Geyelin
The Wall Street Journal
July 16, 2002

Plaintiffs' lawyers are tripping over each other to sue Wyeth on news its Prempro hormone-replacement therapy heightens the risk of breast cancer, stroke and heart disease.

In Chicago, lawyer Kenneth B. Moll filed a suit Monday in U.S. federal court seeking compensation for thousands of women around the country who have allegedly been injured by the drug. The suit seeks medical monitoring for an even larger group of women who used the drug, and an information campaign to warn them.

"We've gotten hundreds of calls from people all around the world," Mr. Moll said. He was beaten to the courthouse by Schiffrin & Barroway LLP, a Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, firm that filed a suit Thursday in state court in Philadelphia seeking national class-action status.

The suit was filed one day after the news that a federally funded study of hormone-replacement therapy was halted three years early because of the surprise results. By Friday, Schiffrin & Barroway's Web page was directing potential claimants to "Sign Up and Join a Class Action" via an online application.

Also on Friday, Davis, Saperstein & Salomon P.C. in Teaneck, New Jersey, launched a wave of three-a-day radio spots in the New York area urging worried listeners to call its toll-free number.

"We're thinking of looking just at individual cases at this point because each and every one is different, but we're not ruling out a class action," said Sam Davis, a lawyer at the firm. More than 60 callers had phoned by Monday, he said. Prempro, a combination estrogen/progestin pill, is used by about six million women.

As with other hormone-replacement therapies in use for 50 years, older women take it to protect against heart disease and osteoporosis and to treat the symptoms of menopause such as hot flashes, night sweats and vaginal dryness.

The federally funded Women's Health Initiative found that taking Prempro reduced the incidence of osteoporosis and colorectal cancer, but its dangers were found to outweigh those benefits. Women on the treatment had a 26% higher incidence of breast cancer, a 29% higher incidence of heart attacks, a 41% higher number of strokes and double the number of blood clots in the legs and veins, the study found.

Still, the risk to individual women is low. Of 10,000 women taking the treatment for one year, there would be seven more heart attacks and eight more with breast cancer, according to the study. Prempro might seem like a litigation bonanza, but some plaintiffs' lawyers are holding back until more is known about the number of injuries and how they may be connected to the drug, as well as the suitability of lumping potentially large numbers of disparate claimants into class actions.

Some plaintiffs' lawyers said injury and death claims are more likely to be pursued case by case, while suits seeking class-action status will concentrate on recovering the cost of medical monitoring, the money the women spent on Prempro and a warning program to alert women who used the treatment.

Many plaintiffs' lawyers, moreover, are wary at this stage of overdrawn comparisons between Prempro and the last big problem drug for Wyeth, which made one of the two drugs in the disastrous diet-pill combination known as fen-phen.

"I've been very negative in talking with other lawyers," says Paul Rheingold, a New York plaintiffs' lawyer who specializes in defective medical products and helped drive the fen-phen litigation.

One problem, says Mr. Rheingold, is that heart disease and breast cancer are not "signature illnesses" that can be directly traced to Prempro; by contrast, the damage to heart valves caused by fen-phen is more distinguishable.

Another difference: Prempro was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, while the combination of drugs marketed by Wyeth in fen-phen was not. Of course, Wyeth, based in Madison, New Jersey, dismisses the suits as unfounded.

"Our view is that we don't believe there [are] any legal or factual bases for any claims against Wyeth," spokesman Lowell Weiner said. Wyeth is bracing for a Prempro onslaught. The company has contacted six major law firms that focus on defending companies to make sure they'll be able to handle the load.

"We've been on the phone ourselves," said Louis Hoynes, Wyeth's executive vice president and general counsel.

View Article

Client Reviews

"He’s not afraid to take on the big companies. He has sued Ford, he has sued Merck, Bridgestone, Firestone… He’s fearless. He’s relentless." Deane Brown
"He was able to richly bless us with some medical reimbursements for losing Hope that we didn’t expect. It didn’t replace Hope, it never will replace. But it just gave us a lot of blessing." Melanie Moul
"He was there not to do something for himself, he was there to help me with my problem. And that’s what he did, he took care of it." Anne Levy
"Ken is unique among attorneys that I've worked with because as he pursues cases, he's always focused on the individuals, strategizing ways to best serve the needs of the client. He's a lawyer for people." John Galarnyk
"He’s very kind, and he’s just someone that you can really count on. Always." Michael McStraw