We are happy to announce that we're celebrating 30 years! →

Published on:

alexas_fotos-refrigerator-1728501_1920-e1786222620281In June, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and Galanz Americas Limited announced a recall of the latter’s retro refrigerators. It turns out their internal electrical parts can short circuit and catch on fire, presenting a risk of death or serious injury from burns. The number of units affected is 121,680.  If you were burned while using a Galanz Americas’ retro refrigerator, you should call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability attorneys of Moll Law Group. Billions have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Case

The retro refrigerators were sold in white, red, blue and black. They are around 21 inches wide, 24 inches deep, and 58 inches high, and they have a 7.6 cubic foot capacity. There are models with either right- or left-hand opening doors, and they have a drawer, three adjustable glass shelves, and the top freezer has a door with one drawer. “Galanz” is printed on the freezer. The refrigerators in this recall have date codes from December 2018-December 2020, and one of these model numbers will be printed on a white label (along with the date code and model number) on the back of the refrigerator. They were sold at Amazon.com and at Home Depot from January 2019-September 2022 for $330-$520.

There have been at least 34 reports of refrigerator fires. According to a local fire department report, one of these caused a fatality. You should immediately stop storing food in the recalled refrigerators. It is possible to get a free in-home repair by a technician, but this would be insufficient for those who suffered burns or other harm.

Continue reading →

Published on:

https://www.molllawgroup.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Screen-Shot-2026-09-01-at-10.01.18-AM-262x300.pngIn August, Louisville, Featherlite, Lite & Century Attic Stairway Ladders with gas struts were recalled. These ladders, which have handrails and fold into attics, are made of aluminum or wood frame. The problem with them is that the bolts on them can break while someone is on the ladder, which can result in serious injuries or deaths. The recall is large; it affects 1,770,000 stairways. If you were injured or a loved one died on the Louisville, Featherlite, Lite & Century Attic Stairway Ladders, you should consult the seasoned Chicago-based product liability attorneys of Moll Law Group. Billions have been recovered in lawsuits with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Lawsuit

The Louisville, Featherlite, Lite & Century Attic Stairway Ladders with gas struts were sold in different frame sizes. They fit into a wide range of attic openings in the ceiling. These openings can be 22.5, 25.5 and 30.0 inches wide and 54 and 60 inches long. The stairs go with ceilings that are anywhere from 7 ft. 8 inches to 12 feet. From November 2012-July 2026, they were sold at various retailers including Home Depot, Lowe’s Orgill, Amazon, and Do It Best for $170-$600.

There have been 11 reports to the company that a bolt has broken. One person was injured in their back, head, and neck.

Continue reading →

Published on:

silviarita-easter-3165469-scaled-e1786223780583On August 6, 2026, OKK Trading recalled its Easter LED Headbands. The headbands violated the mandatory standard for toys that have button cell and coin batteries by using lithium coin batteries, which can be easily found by children, who then may consume the battery. When a button cell or coin battery is swallowed, the result can be internal chemical burns, serious injuries, or even death. Around 25, 200 Easter LED headbands were impacted by the recall. If your child swallowed one of the batteries inside the headbands, please call Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a claim. Billions have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Lawsuit

There are three different Easter LED headband models. One is Model 44694, which comes in white with satin ear linings with a fluffy white band and backing. The ear linings are light pink, dark pink, red or light blue. The headband is packaged in a bag marked OKK Trading, Inc. and “Item#44694.” Another is Model 46210, which comes in white, light pink, dark pink, red, purple, and turquoise and has ears with multicolor polka dots. They are packaged in bags made of clear plastic and labeled with Item#46310 and OKK Trading, Inc. Still another is Model 46309, which comes in light pink, white, purple, and turquoise. It has fluffy ears and fur edging the band. Like the others, these headbands are placed in clear plastic bag marked “Item#46309” and “OKK Trading, Inc.”

As a remedy, customers have been asked to immediately cease usage of the Easter LED Headbands and ask OKK Trading for a refund. While you’ll be asked to email recall@okktoys.com a photograph that shows you threw the headband away (and you should only dispose of button cell batteries by adhering to local hazardous waste procedures), you should not do this if your child was injured by the headband. The product could be evidence in the event that you need to bring a product liability lawsuit.

Continue reading →

Published on:

truhomereo-kitchen-7706307-scaled-e1786223299306On June 11, 2026, Kitchen HQ thermal insulated bowls were recalled by manufacturer HSN because it was found that the metal springs in the insulated bowls’ detachable hinged lid can catch on fire when it’s used in a microwave, presenting a fire risk. Around 86,040 units were affected. If you were burned or otherwise injured by one of the Kitchen HQ thermal insulated bowls after putting it in the microwave, you may have a claim. You should call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability attorneys of Moll Law Group. Billions of dollars have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Lawsuit

HSN has received 30 reports that the bowls in question sparked, smoked, melted or caught fire when put in the microwave. In one case, putting the bowl in the microwave resulted in a fire that created property damage.

The Kitchen HQ thermal insulated bowls with detachable hinged lids are sold in many different colors and have metal interiors and plastic exteriors. “KITCHEN HQ” is printed over the front of the bowl. The models that are impacted include the 10-cup bowl (SKN 817800); the set that incorporates both the 10.5-cup and 2-cup bowls (SKN 884907); and the set of three that incorporates the 10.4-cup, 6-cup, and 2-cup bowls (SKN 900600).

Continue reading →

Published on:

framtidsskeppet-baby-7895417-scaled-e1786222149637On June 4, TOMY recalled its 8 oz. Boon NURSH reusable baby bottles because of problems that could lead to a baby or small child choking. The hard plastic shell around the bottle can partially peel off or bubble, and this can cause there to be loose scraps of filmy plastic. The remedy is to obtain a refund and replacement, but if your child was harmed by the pieces of plastic, this wouldn’t be sufficient, and you should call the seasoned Chicago-based lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable basis to bring a lawsuit.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Claim

This recall involves Boon NURSH 8 oz Reusable Baby Bottles 3-Pack in pink tie dye. Around 40,000 units of these reusable baby bottles were affected; TOMY has gotten 135 reports of peeling and bubbling, but there have been no reported injuries. The bottles are pink tie dye in color and came in a 3-pack. The bottles are made of soft silicone pouches surrounded by hard outer plastic shells with the Boon logo on the side of them. At the bottom of the packaging are the item number B11654 and the UPC 669028116546.

These bottles were sold at Walmart from November 2025-May 2026 as well as online on Walmart.com. They had a retail value of $20.

Continue reading →

Published on:

merzaye-child-7648701-scaled-e1783884860595On June 11, 2026, Joyin, the manufacturer of Sloosh dive sticks recalled them. They were recalled because they violate a federal dive sticks ban; they are over the compress limit and therefore present the risk of impalement, particularly in shallow water, where a child could fall onto one of them, resulting in severe injuries. It is also possible that a child could suffer facial or eye injuries when trying to pick up the sticks under water. About 254,000 units of the dive sticks were affected by the recall. If your child was injured by a Sloosh dive stick, call the experienced Chicago-based lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable claim. Billions have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Sloosh Dive Stick Case

The recalled Sloosh dive sticks are included in model 40041 packages of Sloosh water toys that were sold before October 23, 2025. These packages include not only five dive sticks but also 25 other pieces. The sticks are essentially cylinders made of hard plastic that are 7 inches long and about 1 inch or less in diameter. These sticks are different colors. You can see whether your dive sticks are part of the recall by looking at the back of the box of the Sloosh toys to see whether the model number 40041 is printed by the bar code and printed on top of one end of the dive stick, next to Joyin’s name and tracking information. The Sloosh dive sticks were sold from February 2019-October 2025 for $17-$22 at Amazon.com, Plus.Target.com, Temu.com, SHEIN.com, and Wayfair.com, from February 2019 through October 2025 for between $17 and $22.

There have been no injuries reported so far. However, consumers have been asked to stop using the recalled dive sticks right away and to take them away from children. If there were no injuries as a result of using the dive sticks, you can take a photo of them and email it to Joyin at support@joyin.com, in order to receive redesigned dive sticks that are compliant with federal regulations. This remedy would likely be inadequate, however, if your child suffered piercing or other injuries as a result of these toys. When a toy is defective and causes injuries to a child, it may be appropriate to pursue damages in a product liability lawsuit. These lawsuits can be brought when a toy or other product is defective in terms of its design, manufacturing, or marketing.

Continue reading →

Published on:

engin_akyurt-coffee-2425303-scaled-e1783884544683Recently, a number of lawsuits against AI companies have sought to use product liability theory and strategy to hold them accountable for injuries to consumers, especially minors. Some pundits have called this a Big Tobacco moment— using product liability law in this context is novel; but these theories were also successfully used to go after big tobacco companies in the 1990s and to achieve multibillion dollar settlements and changes to cigarette marketing. One of the most prominent pieces of current AI litigation is Florida’s first-in-the-nation lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman based on the accusation that ChatGPT advised the gunman in a fatal shooting at Florida State University. If you were injured by AI, please give our seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers a call. We have many years of experience, and billions of dollars have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Case

The Florida AI lawsuit alleges, among other things, that the company knowingly and aggressively marketed ChatGPT to the public, while hiding significant risks and suppressing safety warnings. Plaintiffs argue that ChatGPT is a dangerous product that has caused users to perpetrate violent acts or suffer from mental health problems. OpenAI, meanwhile, has denied it has done anything wrong.

The Florida AI lawsuit and private lawsuits similar to it are using a product liability strategy similar to the one simultaneously being used against significant social media platforms; they are claiming the AI is defective (large social media companies like Meta have been held accountable for failing to put in place safeguards against sexual predators and addiction). Product liability strategies are especially important because Congress has lagged in enacting federal AI safety regulation that would apply in every state across the country. Without uniform federal standards for the development and implementation of AI, each state is left to enact different and potentially contradictory standards.

Continue reading →

Published on:

parentingupstream-hospital-840135-scaled-e1783883169792AngioDynamics port catheters are devices that give patients long-term access to their veins for treatments like chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) received hundreds of reports of failures. Many lawsuits were filed claiming that the AngioDynamics’ and its subsidiary Navilyst Medical’s port catheters caused serious injuries, and these were consolidated into federal multidistrict litigation so that the lawsuits could be more efficiently and consistently handled. If you or a loved one was injured by an AngioDynamic port catheter, you should call the seasoned Chicago-based lawyers of Moll Law Group to find out whether you have a viable claim. Billions have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Claim

The AngioDynamic lawsuits allege that the manufacturer used too much barium sulfate in the port catheters. This substance caused cracking, pitting, and degradation in the devices, and made them more likely to fracture such that they could perforate organs or blood vessels or lead to blood clots and more. Some of the injuries reported have included pulmonary embolism, mechanical failures, infection, components getting embedded in tissue, and foreign objects migrating in patients’ bodies. When a catheter fractures inside a patient, other serious complications can occur including heart rhythm difficulties and bleeding, and further surgeries may be needed. In addition to being expensive, these procedures may come with substantial pain and suffering and emotional anguish.

The plaintiffs in 19 actions moved to centralize the litigation in the Western District of Missouri. The defendants opposed the motion and proposed, in the alternative, other districts. It was determined that the actions involved common factual questions about the excessive barium sulfate concentration that caused the material to degrade and fracture, and so centralization in the Southern District of California, where five of the actions were pending, would be in the interests of the parties’ and witness’ convenience and promote just and efficient litigation.

Continue reading →

Published on:

sasint-operation-1807543-scaled-e1783882851346Years ago, lawsuits were brought against manufacturer Olympus based on allegations by patients that they had developed superbug infections after their doctors performed procedures using reusable duodenoscopes on them. These lawsuits are being brought again today. These reusable instruments are used in many, many endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures each year to diagnose and treat problems with the bile ducts, gallbladder, pancreas and liver. In one case, the plaintiff alleges that Olympus didn’t adequately warn doctors, hospitals, and patients that reusable duodenoscopes can retain antibiotic-resistant microorganisms, even when they are properly reprocessed. If you or a loved one was harmed by Olympus Scopes, please call the seasoned Chicago-based lawyers of Moll Law Group. Billions have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Claim

According to many of the plaintiffs in the recent duodenoscope suits, the duodenoscopes had design defects that made the scopes hard to clean such that contaminants stayed on the scopes and came into patients’ bodies during the procedures.

Duodenoscopes are used in hundreds of thousands of endoscopic retrograde (ERCP) procedures every year to examine, diagnose and treat issues in the liver, pancreas, gallbladder and bile ducts. In the early 2010s, there were numerous outbreaks of superbugs across the country. Superbugs are serious because they can resist antibiotics, which makes them especially difficult to address. Superbugs include: C. diff CRE, ESBL, and MRSA. Olympus was required to pay $6.6 million to one hospital because of a superbug outbreak resulting in a patient death in 2017.

Continue reading →

Published on:

geraldoswald62-blood-pressure-monitor-1749577_640-e1780782157644The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recalled the generic blood pressure drug prazosin because it contains higher than acceptable levels of nitrosamines, which are cancer-causing chemicals. If you were injured by prazosin, you may have a claim. You should call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability attorneys of Moll Law Group. Billions have been recovered in lawsuits around the nation with which we’ve been involved.

Contact Moll Law Group About Your Claim

Prazosin is a generic version of a drug that has been available for over 25 years. Teva announced the recall on Oct. 7, 2025. It impacts over 580,000 prazosin capsules. The drug is prescribed to about 510,000 patients every year for high blood pressure, but also for PTSD.

Nitrosamines are the byproducts of common chemical reactions. They can be produced in connection with industrial processes or in food that contains nitrite preservatives such as bacon. Generally, exposure to a small amount of nitrosamines is not considered hazardous, but there have been studies showing that some nitrosamines are carcinogenic, or cancer-causing, when consumed in large quantities over longer time periods.

Continue reading →

Contact Information