Articles Posted in Product Liability

On November 26, 2025, the KingPavonini Adult Portable Bed Rails were recalled. The affected bed rails violate the mandatory standard for adult portable bed rails. The person using the rail can get trapped between the bed rail and the side of the mattress or even within the bedrail, resulting in the danger of entrapment or death by asphyxiation. The affected models do not carry required hazard warning labels. Around 81,050 KingPavonini-branded bed rails were affected. If you were injured or a loved one died due to these bed rails, you should call the Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group. Billions have been recovered in lawsuits with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Defective Bed Rails

There are six models of KingPavonini bed rails that were recalled. The model numbers are BC-LDFS, 04-BC-LDFS, LDFS-SSK, BC-LDFS-X, BC-CBJ, and BC-CBJ-X. You can find the model number of your bed rail in the owner’s manual. The ones that are recalled have black or white tubing and rounded black foam rubber handle grips. There is a black fabric pouch. The fabric cover has “KingPavonini” written on it. Certain models include motion-sensor lights and support legs.

In instances involving injury or death due to bed rails, it may be appropriate to bring a product liability lawsuit. These lawsuits are pursued when a product is defective as a result of its design, manufacturing or marketing. Design defects are those flaws in the specifications; when products are made according to the specifications, they exist in every unit of a product. Manufacturing defects are flaws in how the product was made; they involve deviations from the specifications and exist in one unit or a batch of units, but typically not in every unit of the product. Marketing defects usually involve a failure to warn about a dangerous feature of the product.

Continue reading →

Thirty-nine infants have been hospitalized with botulism, which can be fatal, and officials have linked their illness with ByHeart Whole Nutrition Infant Formula. The infants range in age from 16 to 264 days. There have been no deaths so far. All ByHeart baby formula has been recalled. Despite the ongoing recall, recalled formula is still being found and sold in Walmart, Target, Kroger, Acme, and Shaw’s. The FDA is working to remove all products that may have been impacted from stores, but it’s important to take care and not by any ByHeart baby formula product 

Parents and caregivers who use the product have been asked to record the identifying information at the bottom of the packaging and throw it away—however, if your child has gotten sick, you should first consult the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine your legal options and whether you have a viable claim. Billions have been recovered in lawsuits with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Potential ByHeart Baby Formula Claim

Babies who develop infant botulism do so because of a bacteria-produced toxin. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has explained that the symptom can include poor feeding, loss of head control, problems swallowing, and constipation, and they can lead to death or paralysis. It’s important to be aware that botulism may not develop for weeks, and so parents or caregivers that have given ByHeart formula to babies recently should closely watch the child for symptoms.

Continue reading →

On October 7, Teva Pharmaceuticals recalled 580,844 bottles of Prazosin Hydrochloride alpha-blocker capsules that are prescribed as a blood pressure medication for hypertension. Sometimes the pills are sold under “Minipress.” Tests revealed that this medication had significant levels of potentially cancerous chemicals; specifically, the tests showed that the 1, 2, and 5 mg had above acceptable intake limits for N-nitroso Prazosin impurity C, a chemical compounds linked to cancer. The capsules were distributed around the country. If you developed cancer because of Prazosin Hydrochloride, you should consult the experienced Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group. Billions have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Blood Pressure Medication Claim

Fifty-five lots of Prazosin Hydrochloride capsules were recalled. A few weeks after the initial recall, the recall was classified as a Class II recall. This is a type of recall used when a harmful product could cause temporary or medically reversible negative health effects or where the probability of serious negative health effects is remote. Teva USA’s assessment found that the overall harm in the patient population was considered to be medium. It said it hasn’t received pertinent complaints related to the pills.

Teva claims it sent recall letters to consumers with instructions on how to return the packets. You can also check with your pharmacist about what to do with remaining pills. However, if you’ve been injured and believe it was the result of your blood pressure medication, you’ll what to keep your pills as evidence. You’ll also want to consult with seasoned attorneys about your claim. In some cases, when a consumer is injured by their blood pressure medication, it’s appropriate to sue for compensation by bringing a product liability lawsuit. These lawsuits are filed when there is a design, manufacturing, or marketing defect. In most cases, our lawyers will need to retain experts to determine whether the problem with the medication can be chalked up to a defect.

Continue reading →

Over 15,000 packages of Neutrogena makeup wipes were voluntarily recalled in September because the parent company of Neutrogena was concerned about possible bacterial contamination. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported that the recalled wiped were distributed in Texas, South Carolina, Florida and Georgia. Certain of the wipes tested positive for Pluralibacter gergoviae, a bacterium that can cause infections. If you believe you were harmed or given an infection by a Neutrogena wipe, you should call the seasoned Chicago-based lawyers of Moll Law Group. Billions have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved.

Consult Moll Law Group About Your Neutrogena Wipe Claim

Around 1312 cases of the Neutrogena 50-count 25-pack makeup remover ultrasoft cleansing wipes with the lot number 1835U6325A. There are 12 packages per case, according to the recall notice. Neutrogena’s parent company has claimed it recalled these wipes out of an abundance of caution and that other products of the company weren’t exposed. However, the recall was made a Class II recall last month. This is a more serious type of recall in which use or exposure to the recalled item could cause temporary or medically reversible negative health effects or the probability of serious health problems as a result of exposure is remote.

Pluralibacter gergoviae, or P. gergoviae, is a bacterium that doesn’t usually present medical risk to healthy people, but the FDA has announced that it can result in serious infections in people with weakened immune systems or chronic illnesses. For example, if you’re immunocompromised, the bacteria could result in respiratory diseases, urinary tract infections, eye infections and even sepsis. Cosmetics typically have preservatives, but they don’t kill this type of bacteria.

Continue reading →

A Consumer Reports investigation found that some protein shakes and powder include dangerous levels of lead. The published report includes an analysis of 23 protein shakes and powder containing plant-based, beef and dairy proteins. It determined that more than 2/3 of the shakes and powders included more lead in a single serving than what experts believe is safe to consumer. The safe amount to consume is about .5 mcg in a day. If you believe you were harmed as a result of protein shakes or powder, you should call the knowledgeable Chicago-based attorneys of Moll Law Group about your claim. Billions have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Claim

Many people are trying to incorporate more protein in their daily routine. One way they do that is to add protein shakes or powders. Unfortunately, the report and tests have discovered that the metal contamination in protein supplements is widespread and has worsened since prior testing 15 years before. The lead in the plant-based protein items were around nine times the amount in whey or beef-based protein. The highest amounts of lead were in Huel’s Black Edition, which had 6.3 micrograms of lead in a single serving or around 1290% of Consumer Report’s daily lead limit, and Naked Nutrition’s Vegan Mass Gainer, which included 7.7 micrograms of lead in each serving or around 1570% of the daily lead limit; the report categorized these as products to avoid. One serving of Huel’s Black Edition also included 9.2 micrograms of cadmium, which is more than twice the amount that experts say could be harmful to consume daily.

Other powders that were tested and contain lead between 400-600% of Consumer Report’s lead limit were Momentous’s 100% Plant Protein and Garden of Life’s Sport Organic Plant-Based Protein. Consumer Reports advised consumers to drink these only once a week. Muscle Meds’ Carnivor Mass powder had lead at more than 200% of Consumer Reports’ lead limit. Six other plant-based powders, along with 5 dairy-based powders and shakes and one beef-based powder.

Continue reading →

Southwind Foods, LLC has had a series of recalls due to possible radionuclide (Cesium-137) contamination. There are widespread traces of Cs-137 in the environment, but they can be found in higher levels in water or food that’s been produced in an area that is environmentally contaminated. Repeated low-level exposure to contaminated food or water can be dangerous because it can elevate the risk of cancer. If you believe you were harmed by contaminated shrimp, you should consult the seasoned Chicago-based lawyers of Moll Law Group. Billions have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Case

The initial Southwind recall on August 21, 2025 involved bagged frozen shrimp that was distributed to retailers, wholesalers and distributors in certain states between June 24-September 16, 2025. The shrimp was sold under the brand names Sand Bar/Arctic Shores/Best Yet/Great American/First Street.

The FDA began actively investigating the findings of Cesium-137 contamination in frozen shrimp products that were processed by PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati. Subsequently, even more shrimp processed by this Indonesian company has been recalled because it might be radioactive. Another recall occurred on August 22 of Great Value-branded frozen raw shrimp. On August 27, frozen cooked shrimp sold under the brand Kroger Mercado was recalled. On August 28, Aqua Star-branded cocktail shrimp was recalled. Other recalls have been of the brands Aqua Star, Kroger, and Sand Bar/Arctic Shores/Best Yet/Great American First Street.

Continue reading →

Hillshire Brands Company recently issued a major recall, which the U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service classified as a Class I recall, of about 58 million pounds of corn dogs and sausage-on-a-stick products. The reason for the recall is that these products may have pieces of wood embedded in the batter. There have been five reports of injuries so far. Class I recalls are the most serious types of recalls. If you were injured as a result of wood embedded in the battered portions of your corn dog or sausage-on-a-stick, you should call the seasoned Chicago-based attorneys of Moll Law Group. Billions have been recovered in lawsuits around the country with which we’ve been involved.

Consult Moll Law Group About Your Corn Dog Claim

There have been multiple consumer complaints about the corn dogs and sausage-on-a-stick products. The company has received multiple complaints from consumers, including five reports of injuries. The U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service has classified the recall as Class I, the highest threat level.

The affected corn dog and sausage-on-a-stick products were mostly branded as Jimmy Dean and State Farm products. They were packaged between March 17-2025-September 26, 2025, and either sold online or shipped around the country to various food service locations and retailers, as well as school districts and Department of Defense facilities around the country. The affected products also have the establishment number “EST-582” or “P-894” printed on the packaging. These items were sold online and shipped to retail and food service locations nationwide.

Continue reading →

The global demand for plush elf dolls or “Labubus” owned by celebrities like Rihanna, Kim Kardashian, and K-pop star Lisa of Blackpink has given rise to counterfeit dolls called “Lafufus.” The Lafufus have their own fans but they also give rise to many consumer complaints. The Labubus come in blind boxes that leave buyers not knowing what is inside, and this increases excitement, but it also makes it easier to counterfeit the dolls. This month, the Chartered Trading Standards Institute, a Britain-based nonprofit focused on consumer protection issued an urgent warning about the rise in Lafufu sales. The warning stated that the fakes are poorly made in unsafe places and could include dangerous chemicals that could cause permanent organ damage in children. If your child was harmed by a counterfeit doll, you should give the seasoned Chicago-based lawyers of Moll Law Group a call.

Consult Moll Law Group About Your Claim

Problems have arisen all over the world in connection with the fake Lafufus. The Institute claims that it seized thousands of dolls in Britain and is investigating the connection between the counterfeits and organized crime groups. Customs officials in Cyprus have also conducted raids of places for the counterfeit dolls resulting in over 1300 fake dolls being pulled from stores. In June, Chinese customs authorities confiscated over 200,000 counterfeit Labubu products.

The United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) ordered the seizure of thousands of the counterfeits on the grounds that they violate a ban on small parts for toys for children under 3 and also break apart easily and present a notable danger of choking and death. The Better Business Bureau has also warned about the Lafufus, which have been the subject of more than 100 complaints on its scam tracker. Some consumer groups raised the issue that the sellers promised real Labubus but sent broken or defective toys.

Continue reading →

Recently, TTI Outdoor Power Equipment recalled its Ryobi brushless electric pressure washers due to the risk of the pressure washer’s capacitor overheating and bursting, resulting in parts being forcefully ejected and presenting a threat of serious injury to both the user and bystanders. Around 764,000 units were affected. If you were injured by a Ryobi Electric Pressure Washer, you should call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group. Billions have been recovered in cases with which we’ve been involved all around the country.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Claim

Importantly, the manufacturer has gotten 135 reports of overheating capacitors. This includes 41 reports of explosions. There have been 32 injuries or fractures to the hands, fingers, eyes, and face. The pressure washer was sold across the United States at Home Depot and Direct Tools Factory Outlet stores and also sold online at homedepot.com and directtoolsoutlet.com from July 2017-June 2024. The purchase price was $300-400.

The recalled models of Ryobi brushless electric pressure washers are RY142300 and RY142711VNM. The affected serial numbers for RY142300 are EU17121D010001 through EU20256N180999; LT20211D140001 through LT21166D090999; RG22154D090001 through RG23182N140999. The affected serial numbers for RY142711VNM are LT21411D090001 through LT21425D090999 and RG21411D010001 through RG23182N140999. You can find the model and serial numbers on a data plate on the side of the housing for the motor. The pressure washers are green with “Ryobi” printed on the front, and have a spray nozzle, as well as a detergent tank with a blue cap.

Continue reading →