Proposed Class Action Fairness Act Would Mean Major Changes for Class Litigation in Federal Courts
A senator from Virginia has introduced a proposed piece of legislation that would have dramatic implications for class action litigation if passed. The senator proposed the legislation with the intent of making class action lawsuits more fair and more efficient for all parties involved, including the court system. The bill would increase the recoveries for victims deemed deserving and filter out claims considered unmeritorious. These meritless claims are viewed as an unnecessary burden on judicial resources, according to proponents of the bill.
There are a number of ways that the legislation would change class action litigation in federal courts throughout the United States. Here are some examples. First, the legislation would require the plaintiff to demonstrate to an affirmative degree that there is “a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism” that the court can use to determine which potential class members are encompassed within the class. That mechanism would also need to provide a feasible and reliable way to distribute funds to those class members.
Next, attorneys would be prohibited from receiving class counsel fees until an accounting of the overall amount of fees that the defendant had dispersed is conducted. One of the things that the accounting would need to identify is the overall amount of compensation given to the class, the estimated or actual number of members in the class, the average compensation amount disbursed, and the highest sum provided to any single class member. It would also have to list any amounts paid to other individuals, including plaintiff’s counsel, and the reason for the payment.
Class counsel would also be prohibited from representing their relatives under the proposed legislation, which imposes a broader set of strict controls on conflicts of interest.
Regarding discovery, the bill would require the court to enter a stay of proceedings in the event a motion to transfer, motion to strike class allegations, motion to dismiss, or other dispositive motion regarding the class allegations was filed. The court would have the option to forgo the stay in the event it deems discovery necessary to preserve evidence and prevent prejudice to the requesting party.
Finally, an appeals court would be required to allow an appeal from any order granting or denying a class action certification. Currently, appellate courts have discretion to hear appeals of orders granting or denying a Rule 23 class action certification.
At Moll Law Group, our dedicated team of class action lawyers has handled a wide variety of lawsuits, including food contamination, medical devices, and other product liability claims. As experienced litigators, we have the knowledge and skill it takes to navigate the judicial system and to ensure that your rights are protected throughout the process. We serve clients across the United States, including in Florida, Illinois, New York, and California. To schedule your free consultation, call us now at 312-462-1700 or contact us online.
Foodborne Illness Outbreak Linked to Raw Milk Vending Machine in UK Raises Awareness About Safety of Unpasteurized Dairy Products
Federal Court Allows Shareholder Lawsuit Against Medtronic Alleging Fraud Regarding Infuse Product to Go Forward
Wrongful Death Lawsuit Involving Exposure to Mislabeled Toxic Chemicals Highlights Importance of Workplace Safety for Illinois Workers