We are happy to announce that we're celebrating 30 years! →

Cook IVC Filter

Cook IVC Filter

Lawyers Helping Consumers Nationwide Injured by Defective Medical Devices

IVC filters are spider-like devices that are implanted in patients for the purpose of stopping blood clots from migrating to the lungs. Cook Medical is a device manufacturer that makes different types of IVC filters, such as the Cook Celect IVC and the Günther Tulip IVC filters. The manufacturer received approval for the IVC filters under the FDA 510(k) fast track approval process, which requires only minimal testing before putting a device on the market. However, our IVC filter lawyers know that medical journals have reported substantial problems with the filters. Due to these problems, many patients have suffered serious complications, such as perforation injuries and organ damage. If you were hurt by a Cook IVC filter or another defective medical device, the product liability attorneys at Moll Law Group are available to represent you in pursuing compensation for your injuries. Billions of dollars have been recovered in cases in which we were involved.

Holding a Manufacturer Accountable for Harm Caused by an IVC Filter

Studies have shown that when retrievable IVC filters, such as the Cook IVC filters, are left in place after the risk of pulmonary embolism is gone, the legs of the filter can fracture. Pieces of the filter may travel into the lungs or be lodged in other body parts, resulting in severe chest pain. Often, emergency medical care is required to determine the cause. In 2014, the FDA warned that these filters could break and should be retrieved and removed within 1-2 months after the risk of pulmonary embolism is over.

The strongest product liability claims that may be made against the Cook IVC filters are based on design defects and failures to warn. Plaintiffs hoping to prove design defects have two tests that they can use. The dominant test is the risk-utility test, in which the plaintiff must show that the safety benefits of designing away a foreseeable risk exceed the costs of the alternative design. It is usually necessary to retain an expert to testify on an alternative design. The other test is the consumer expectations test, which looks at whether the design meets consumers' safety expectations.

A failure to warn is considered a marketing defect. A plaintiff trying to establish liability based on a failure to warn must prove with the assistance of an IVC filter lawyer that:

  • The defendant manufactured the IVC filter or was otherwise in the chain of distribution;
  • The IVC filter carried risks that could be known based on the scientific knowledge accepted by the scientific community at the time of manufacturing or distribution;
  • The risk posed a serious danger when the filter was used or misused in a reasonably foreseeable manner;
  • Ordinary consumers would not realize the potential risk;
  • The defendant failed to provide adequate warnings of the risk that the filter would break and migrate;
  • The plaintiff was injured; and
  • The lack of warnings was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's injuries.

Most jurisdictions recognize the learned intermediary doctrine. Under this rule, manufacturer warnings provided to a doctor are sufficient to discharge the manufacturer's obligation to warn. If a doctor chooses to use an IVC filter anyway, and injuries are the result, it may be more appropriate to bring a medical malpractice claim than a product liability lawsuit.

Consult an IVC Filter Attorney to Protect Your Rights

If you suffered harm due to a Cook IVC filter, the product liability lawyers at Moll Law Group are available to assist you in seeking compensation for your injuries. We represent injured individuals throughout the U.S., including in California, Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Texas, and Massachusetts. Call us at 312-462-1700 or use our online form to schedule a free initial consultation with an IVC filter attorney.

Client Reviews

"He’s not afraid to take on the big companies. He has sued Ford, he has sued Merck, Bridgestone, Firestone… He’s fearless. He’s relentless." Deane Brown
"He was able to richly bless us with some medical reimbursements for losing Hope that we didn’t expect. It didn’t replace Hope, it never will replace. But it just gave us a lot of blessing." Melanie Moul
"He was there not to do something for himself, he was there to help me with my problem. And that’s what he did, he took care of it." Anne Levy
"Ken is unique among attorneys that I've worked with because as he pursues cases, he's always focused on the individuals, strategizing ways to best serve the needs of the client. He's a lawyer for people." John Galarnyk
"He’s very kind, and he’s just someone that you can really count on. Always." Michael McStraw